Subject: Re: [boost] Another GGL review
From: Phil Endecott (spam_from_boost_dev_at_[hidden])
Date: 2009-11-17 20:12:40
Jonathan Franklin wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 17, 2009 at 2:29 PM, Simonson, Lucanus J
> <lucanus.j.simonson_at_[hidden]> wrote:
>> It is exactly because it is important that I don't want to rush it.
> How long would you estimate it takes to get the interface right? It
> seems like that is really the piece that needs to be enterprise class
> at this point (or at least, when first introduced).
In the context of a Boost library we would surely expect the interface
to a spatial index to be quite similar to the interfaces to std::
containers, so there are quite a few interface design decisions that
are non-issues. In my experience, the only significant novelty in the
interface is how to represent 2D ranges (i.e. to iterate over the
points in a rectangle); a range2d type that takes a reference to the
container and its bounds and provides a similar interface as the
container itself has worked for me.
(Luke, I'd be interested to know if your indexes differ significantly
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk