Re: [boost] Shouldn't both logging proposals be reviewed in the same formal review?

Subject: Re: [boost] Shouldn't both logging proposals be reviewed in the same formal review?
From: Andrey Semashev (andrey.semashev_at_[hidden])
Date: 2009-11-19 13:21:51

Stefan Strasser wrote:

> one review manager for both libraries, even if there are seperate review 
> periods.
> as far as I know the review manager isn't bound to the "votes" anyway, so he 
> should be able to summarize all the problems people see in either library and 
> suggest a way to address those, be it by accepting one of the two libraries, 
> merging them, or rejecting both.

+1. One review manager will surely do a better job than two different 
managers. But this should not be mandatory. We are lacking managers, and 
strict binding libraries with managers will make things worse.