Subject: Re: [boost] Shouldn't both logging proposals be reviewed in the same formal review?
From: Andrey Semashev (andrey.semashev_at_[hidden])
Date: 2009-11-19 13:21:51
Stefan Strasser wrote:
> one review manager for both libraries, even if there are seperate review
> as far as I know the review manager isn't bound to the "votes" anyway, so he
> should be able to summarize all the problems people see in either library and
> suggest a way to address those, be it by accepting one of the two libraries,
> merging them, or rejecting both.
+1. One review manager will surely do a better job than two different
managers. But this should not be mandatory. We are lacking managers, and
strict binding libraries with managers will make things worse.
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk