Subject: Re: [boost] Shouldn't both logging proposals be reviewed in the same formal review?
From: Andrey Semashev (andrey.semashev_at_[hidden])
Date: 2009-11-19 13:17:48
Zachary Turner wrote:
> also, i think it should be mandatory for each library author to review the
> other author's library.
I don't think this is a good idea. I participated John Torjo's library
and despite the fact I tried to be as objective as I could I ended up
comparing my library with John's. As you may imagine, my opinion was biased.
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk