Subject: Re: [boost] Shouldn't both logging proposals be reviewed in the same formal review?
From: Scott McMurray (me22.ca+boost_at_[hidden])
Date: 2009-11-19 13:33:18
2009/11/19 Andrey Semashev <andrey.semashev_at_[hidden]>:
> I don't think this is a good idea. I participated John Torjo's library and
> despite the fact I tried to be as objective as I could I ended up comparing
> my library with John's. As you may imagine, my opinion was biased.
I think intentionally-biased "this is why my way is better" notes from
both authors would be a nice way of discussing the various trade-offs
in the review.
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk