|
|
Boost : |
Subject: Re: [boost] Shouldn't both logging proposals be reviewed in the same formal review?
From: Paul A. Bristow (pbristow_at_[hidden])
Date: 2009-11-19 14:05:23
> -----Original Message-----
> From: boost-bounces_at_[hidden] [mailto:boost-bounces_at_[hidden]] On
Behalf Of
> Andrey Semashev
> Sent: Thursday, November 19, 2009 6:50 PM
> To: boost_at_[hidden]
> Subject: Re: [boost] Shouldn't both logging proposals be reviewed in the same
formal review?
>I don't think it would be ethical of me to influence review results of my
opponent.
I disagree with this strongly - it would be unhelpful for BOTH you NOT to review
the others library.
(Just as review managers can, and should, make their own personal review as well
as making a judgement reading all the other reviews).
You are bound to have expert views and can point out pros and cons of the other
library.
We know who you are ;-)
And we know when "you would say that" - so we can cope with any bias.
But your view will still be informed.
Paul
--- Paul A. Bristow Prizet Farmhouse Kendal, UK LA8 8AB +44 1539 561830, mobile +44 7714330204 pbristow_at_[hidden]
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk