Subject: Re: [boost] Updating the Boost Review Process Was: [GGL] Bost.Polygon (GTL) vs GGL - rationale
From: Barend Gehrels (barend_at_[hidden])
Date: 2009-11-19 14:24:15
Thanks for your response, it clarifies enough. Sorry about your
feelings, we really didn't know. We always wanted to invite you and
inform you. That is how things are meant.
> I'll do my best to let these feeling from the past go, as you say. I've wanted to work together from the beginning. Early on it was challenging because we were both learning and experimenting with syntax for doing what we wanted. Now there are still some semantic differences that prevent merging (as well as syntactic differences.) I think we should look at what is required for our libraries to interoperate first, then we can create a base that is common to both.
> Sorry again, I'll try to keep discussion technical and focus on achiving what is in everyone's best interests,
Great, let's go on, your scenario sounds good.
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk