Subject: Re: [boost] Updating the Boost Review Process Was: [GGL] Bost.Polygon (GTL) vs GGL - rationale
From: Joachim Faulhaber (afojgo_at_[hidden])
Date: 2009-11-19 15:55:16
2009/11/19 Simonson, Lucanus J <lucanus.j.simonson_at_[hidden]>
> I guess I remember more clearly the feeling of being cornered by your
> benchmark results which I had no way to reproduce for myself from an
> algorithm that I didn't know how it worked when the review of my library was
> close. I went out of my way to be positive and friendly in my response, but
> I was concerned that your benchmark results would kill my library's chances
> in review ...
Luke, I really appreciate your very open reply. I can understand your
feelings well. I think this is a very good place to start from for a
creative future of both of your libraries (and authors) working together.
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk