Subject: Re: [boost] Updating the Boost Review Process Was: [GGL] Bost.Polygon (GTL) vs GGL - rationale
From: Stewart, Robert (Robert.Stewart_at_[hidden])
Date: 2009-11-20 09:11:29
Joachim Faulhaber wrote:
> 2009/11/19 Simonson, Lucanus J <lucanus.j.simonson_at_[hidden]>
> > I guess I remember more clearly the feeling of being
> > cornered by your
> > benchmark results which I had no way to reproduce for myself from an
> > algorithm that I didn't know how it worked when the review
> > of my library was
> > close. I went out of my way to be positive and friendly in
> > my response, but
> > I was concerned that your benchmark results would kill my
> > library's chances in review ...
> Luke, I really appreciate your very open reply. I can understand your
> feelings well. I think this is a very good place to start from for a
> creative future of both of your libraries (and authors)
> working together.
I, too, was pleased to see Luke's reply. I was troubled by the angst and even anger in some of the traffic related to geometry over the recent months. I thought some responses were excessive and others confrontational. Things didn't escalate beyond reason, but were frequently edgy. Luke's confession of his perceptions has, I think, cleared the air. I'm likewise pleased that Bahrend has expressed his willingness to forget the past and reasserted his willingness to cooperate with Luke.
It's can be hard to control one's feelings, but assuming the best of others and openly revealing one's own concerns will go a long way toward keeping things civil. I think that's what Luke and Bahrend are now trying to do. I hope that one day the geometry efforts can be merged into a library even better than the two before us now. Time and experience will reveal the right approach where the two diverge. It needn't be personal.
Rob Stewart robert.stewart_at_[hidden]
Software Engineer, Core Software using std::disclaimer;
Susquehanna International Group, LLP http://www.sig.com
IMPORTANT: The information contained in this email and/or its attachments is confidential. If you are not the intended recipient, please notify the sender immediately by reply and immediately delete this message and all its attachments. Any review, use, reproduction, disclosure or dissemination of this message or any attachment by an unintended recipient is strictly prohibited. Neither this message nor any attachment is intended as or should be construed as an offer, solicitation or recommendation to buy or sell any security or other financial instrument. Neither the sender, his or her employer nor any of their respective affiliates makes any warranties as to the completeness or accuracy of any of the information contained herein or that this message or any of its attachments is free of viruses.
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk