Boost :

Date view	Thread view	Subject view	Author view

Subject: Re: [boost] [Review] GGL review starts today, November 5th
From: Brandon Kohn (blkohn_at_[hidden])
Date: 2009-11-19 16:31:10

Next message: Gottlob Frege: "Re: [boost] Shouldn't both logging proposals be reviewed in the same formal review?"
Previous message: Thomas Klimpel: "Re: [boost] Shouldn't both logging proposals be reviewed in the same formal review?"
In reply to: Stewart, Robert: "Re: [boost] [Review] GGL review starts today, November 5th"
Next in thread: Mateusz Loskot: "Re: [boost] [Review] GGL review starts today, November 5th"

Stewart, Robert wrote:
> That is well defined to return built-in types zero-initialized.

Ah, neat I didn't realize that. This is standard on all compilers?

Regards,

Brandon

Next message: Gottlob Frege: "Re: [boost] Shouldn't both logging proposals be reviewed in the same formal review?"
Previous message: Thomas Klimpel: "Re: [boost] Shouldn't both logging proposals be reviewed in the same formal review?"
In reply to: Stewart, Robert: "Re: [boost] [Review] GGL review starts today, November 5th"
Next in thread: Mateusz Loskot: "Re: [boost] [Review] GGL review starts today, November 5th"

Date view	Thread view	Subject view	Author view

Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk