Subject: Re: [boost] Shouldn't both logging proposals be reviewed in the same formal review?
From: Gottlob Frege (gottlobfrege_at_[hidden])
Date: 2009-11-19 16:45:04
On Thu, Nov 19, 2009 at 3:57 PM, Hartmut Kaiser
>> Joachim Faulhaber wrote:
>> > I suggest, for the case of competing libraries, that the
>> > contributors are
>> > supposed to review the opponent's library but to refrain from voting.
>> +1 (I was already thinking the same.)
>> If a competitor votes, the review manager should ignore it, of course.
> Why should the review manager ignore a YES vote of an author of a competing
Only because if that became the rule, it somewhat implies that NOT
VOTING == a NO vote.
Or at least suggests as much.
> Regards Hartmut
> Meet me at BoostCon
hope to see you there
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk