Subject: Re: [boost] Shouldn't both logging proposals be reviewed in the same formal review
From: Steve M. Robbins (steve_at_[hidden])
Date: 2009-11-19 21:00:36
On Thu, Nov 19, 2009 at 04:32:15PM -0800, Tom Brinkman wrote:
> I do however agree with your larger point that boost does not SCALE well.
> Ten years from now, its highly likely that boost will become too large
> to manage.
> People will eventually start asking to distribute boost in parts, where
> the "core" libraries are separated from the "experimental" libraries.
Oh, I don't think this will take ten years. People are already asking
for this, for the past number of years. :-)
Especially people who are creating packages for distribution.
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk