Re: [boost] Shouldn't both logging proposals be reviewed in the same formal review?

Subject: Re: [boost] Shouldn't both logging proposals be reviewed in the same formal review?
From: Gottlob Frege (gottlobfrege_at_[hidden])
Date: 2009-11-20 11:22:15

On 11/20/09, Stewart, Robert <Robert.Stewart_at_[hidden]> wrote:
> Gottlob Frege wrote:
>>
>> Review Lib A
>> comment/ask for changes/ etc
>>
>> Review Lib B
>> comment/ask for changes/etc
>>
>> reject/approve A, B
>>
>> ie don't reject/approve A before reviewing B.
>
> Lib A would be left in limbo for an indeterminate time, with this approach,
> which isn't particularly fair either.
>

True, but there seems to be long time between acceptance (often
conditional) and final submission anyhow.
It would be nice of course for libB to be reviewed asap after libA.

But I don't disagree with you overall. Just trying to offer suggestions.