Re: [boost] [test] Use of snprintf

Subject: Re: [boost] [test] Use of snprintf
From: Mateusz Loskot (mateusz_at_[hidden])
Date: 2009-11-23 10:38:21

Ian Emmons wrote:
> It is probably easier to emulate snprintf using Boost.Format.  I'm
> not sure what requirements you have that cause you to want to
> continue using snprintf, but you may find that you can simply switch
> from snprintf to Boost.Format (with no emulation).

I believe there is confusion. As far as I'm concerned,
I do not have any such requirements.
It is that I was told (see comments here [1]) that Boost.Test will
continue using snprintf, so I'm looking for workaround that would
be acceptable for Boost.Test.

Boost.Format works for me. Does it work for Boost.Test?

[1] https://svn.boost.org/trac/boost/ticket/3558

Best regards,
-- 
Mateusz Loskot, http://mateusz.loskot.net