Subject: Re: [boost] [test] Use of snprintf
From: Mateusz Loskot (mateusz_at_[hidden])
Date: 2009-11-23 10:38:21
Ian Emmons wrote:
> It is probably easier to emulate snprintf using Boost.Format. I'm
> not sure what requirements you have that cause you to want to
> continue using snprintf, but you may find that you can simply switch
> from snprintf to Boost.Format (with no emulation).
I believe there is confusion. As far as I'm concerned,
I do not have any such requirements.
It is that I was told (see comments here ) that Boost.Test will
continue using snprintf, so I'm looking for workaround that would
be acceptable for Boost.Test.
Boost.Format works for me. Does it work for Boost.Test?
-- Mateusz Loskot, http://mateusz.loskot.net
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk