Subject: Re: [boost] [test] Use of snprintf
From: Ian Emmons (iemmons_at_[hidden])
Date: 2009-11-23 11:18:00
I'm sorry, I meant to direct my suggestion to Gennadiy, but I lost track of whose message I had replied to.
On Nov 23, 2009, at 10:38 AM, Mateusz Loskot wrote:
> Ian Emmons wrote:
>> It is probably easier to emulate snprintf using Boost.Format. I'm
>> not sure what requirements you have that cause you to want to
>> continue using snprintf, but you may find that you can simply switch
>> from snprintf to Boost.Format (with no emulation).
> I believe there is confusion. As far as I'm concerned,
> I do not have any such requirements.
> It is that I was told (see comments here ) that Boost.Test will
> continue using snprintf, so I'm looking for workaround that would
> be acceptable for Boost.Test.
> Boost.Format works for me. Does it work for Boost.Test?
>  https://svn.boost.org/trac/boost/ticket/3558
> Best regards,
> Mateusz Loskot, http://mateusz.loskot.net
> Unsubscribe & other changes: http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk