Subject: Re: [boost] Re view Queue Needs Attention
From: Vicente Botet Escriba (vicente.botet_at_[hidden])
Date: 2009-11-24 22:53:18
Stefan Strasser-2 wrote:
> Zitat von Tom Brinkman <reportbase_at_[hidden]>:
>> The number of review requests is
>> far outstripping the number of volunteer review managers.
> is the lack of review managers the bottleneck of the review process right
> I`m relatively new to boost, but judging from the "notes for review
> managers" on the website that doesn`t sound like a lot of work.
> I'm planning to submit a library for review myself, and the prospect
> that that'd take 2 years isn't very encouraging, so I'd probably
> volunteer just for this reason alone.
This is exactly what I did.
> maybe you could regularly post a call for review managers to the
> mailing list, with a list and a short description of libraries in need
> of a review manager?
The review wizard make a report regularly on the Past Review Results and
Milestones page (http://www.boost.org/community/review_schedule.html)
including the information you are requesting
Review Wizard Status Report Ronald Garcia June 4, 2009
-- View this message in context: http://old.nabble.com/Review-Queue-Needs-Attention-tp26500094p26507186.html Sent from the Boost - Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk