Subject: Re: [boost] Review Queue Needs Attention
From: Daniel James (daniel_james_at_[hidden])
Date: 2009-11-25 04:00:29
Paul A. Bristow said
>> (And a state not damned with faint praise like 'unstable' - which is perhaps
>> better described as 'likely_to_be_improved' rather than actively 'not stable').
The apache incubator might be a more appropriate inspiration than
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk