Subject: Re: [boost] Notice: Boost.Atomic (atomic operations library)
From: Andrey Semashev (andrey.semashev_at_[hidden])
Date: 2009-12-03 13:18:10
Oliver Kowalke wrote:
> I believe Helge's plan was to provide an implementation of C++-0x
> atomics - PODs are not part of the 'atomic' interface - so I would vote
> against PODs.
My bad. I was under impression that these functions operate on integral
types rather than classes. Sorry.
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk