Boost logo

Boost :

Subject: Re: [boost] Notice: Boost.Atomic (atomic operations library)
From: Andrey Semashev (andrey.semashev_at_[hidden])
Date: 2009-12-03 13:18:10

Oliver Kowalke wrote:

> I believe Helge's plan was to provide an implementation of C++-0x
> atomics - PODs are not part of the 'atomic' interface - so I would vote
> against PODs.

My bad. I was under impression that these functions operate on integral
types rather than classes. Sorry.

Boost list run by bdawes at, gregod at, cpdaniel at, john at