Subject: Re: [boost] [msm] Review
From: Andrew Venikov (andrew.venikov_at_[hidden])
Date: 2009-12-04 00:10:22
Andreas Huber wrote:
>> We do not have this much overlap in any other library w.r.t.
>> features and interface.
> What about Regex and Xpressive? I know neither of these libraries well,
> but doesn't Xpressive offer what Regex offers and more?
I think an even better example would be map and hash_map.
They serve almost identical purpose but using totally different
techniques. The user of stl is expected to understand the differences
and chose the appropriate container.
Why not do the same with SC and MSM?
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk