Subject: Re: [boost] [msm] Review
From: Dave Abrahams (dave.abrahams_at_[hidden])
Date: 2009-12-05 10:04:44
On Fri, Dec 4, 2009 at 10:54 AM, David Bergman <
> Repeating: the MSM/Statechart overlap in features and interface is quite
> unique to Boost.
They definitely overlap in features and also in intent, but my understanding
is that the interfaces are vastly different, and that's an important
distinguishing feature. Am I missing something?
-- Dave Abrahams BoostPro Computing http://www.boostpro.com
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk