Subject: Re: [boost] Boost.Geometry and extensions
From: Mateusz Loskot (mateusz_at_[hidden])
Date: 2009-12-05 10:34:27
Christian Henning wrote:
> Hi there, I like to see this movement for extensions. What I find the
> right way to be is to have a boost_extension trunk with all the bells
> and whistles that the boost trunk has. Mainly, we need website, trac,
> regression tests, review and release process. I guess this sounds
> similar to the before proposed unstable branch. But here the scope is
> for extensions only. Boost has given us a way on how to structure
> things and we should just copy it.
> Is it possible to have the hosting and testing done on the boost
> servers? What do you think?
Personally, I like this idea very much.
It would help to keep related works in one place,
help users to find it easier, help developers to not to double
maintenance tasks, etc.
-- Mateusz Loskot, http://mateusz.loskot.net Charter Member of OSGeo, http://osgeo.org
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk