Re: [boost] Boost.Geometry and extensions

Subject: Re: [boost] Boost.Geometry and extensions
From: Mateusz Loskot (mateusz_at_[hidden])
Date: 2009-12-05 10:34:27

Christian Henning wrote:
> Hi there, I like to see this movement for extensions. What I find the
> right way to be is to have a boost_extension trunk with all the bells
> and whistles that the boost trunk has. Mainly, we need website, trac,
> regression tests, review and release process. I guess this sounds
> similar to the before proposed unstable branch. But here the scope is
> for extensions only. Boost has given us a way on how to structure
> things and we should just copy it.
> 
> Is it possible to have the hosting and testing done on the boost
> servers? What do you think?

Christian,

Personally, I like this idea very much.
It would help to keep related works in one place,
help users to find it easier, help developers to not to double
maintenance tasks, etc.

Best regards,
-- 
Mateusz Loskot, http://mateusz.loskot.net
Charter Member of OSGeo, http://osgeo.org