Re: [boost] [msm] Review

Subject: Re: [boost] [msm] Review
From: Michael Caisse (boost_at_[hidden])
Date: 2009-12-06 20:06:45

David Bergman wrote:
> On Dec 6, 2009, at 7:25 PM, Patrick Horgan wrote:
>
>   
>> David Bergman wrote:
>>     
>>> Yes, of course, which I have stated in various posts of mine.
>>>
>>> I *know* that the implementations differ, but that was not what we were discussing here, was it? We are discussing whether the feature sets and interfaces are far apart or not.
>>>  
>>>       
>> Could we move on?
>>     
>
> Oh, sorry. But when someone claims that I do not realize that the implementations differ, I have a hard time letting that lie. I do  not enjoy people putting opinions in my virtual mouth.
>
> /David
> _______________________________________________
>   

I apologize David if it came across that way. I was simply trying to determine
if you thought the implementation variations that distinguish a library's
relevance to a target were important to the review. I've read all of your
posts. I know that you can articulate the differences in implementation. I
was just wondering if you thought that was an important distinguisher for
Boost.

As for moving on, I'm happy to do so  (o;

michael

-- 
----------------------------------
Michael Caisse
Object Modeling Designs
www.objectmodelingdesigns.com