Subject: Re: [boost] [msm] Review
From: Michael Caisse (boost_at_[hidden])
Date: 2009-12-06 20:06:45
David Bergman wrote:
> On Dec 6, 2009, at 7:25 PM, Patrick Horgan wrote:
>> David Bergman wrote:
>>> Yes, of course, which I have stated in various posts of mine.
>>> I *know* that the implementations differ, but that was not what we were discussing here, was it? We are discussing whether the feature sets and interfaces are far apart or not.
>> Could we move on?
> Oh, sorry. But when someone claims that I do not realize that the implementations differ, I have a hard time letting that lie. I do not enjoy people putting opinions in my virtual mouth.
I apologize David if it came across that way. I was simply trying to determine
if you thought the implementation variations that distinguish a library's
relevance to a target were important to the review. I've read all of your
posts. I know that you can articulate the differences in implementation. I
was just wondering if you thought that was an important distinguisher for
As for moving on, I'm happy to do so (o;
-- ---------------------------------- Michael Caisse Object Modeling Designs www.objectmodelingdesigns.com
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk