Subject: Re: [boost] [msm] Review
From: David Abrahams (dave_at_[hidden])
Date: 2009-12-06 20:33:03
On Dec 7, 2009, at 1:28 AM, David Bergman wrote:
>> So yes, there *is* overlap but it is certainly far from total, right?
> Not far from, no. If you bring up one feature, multi-TU FSM, I would not call that "far". The overlap is 95%. No?
Just a suggestion, not a mandate: maybe we should consider whether this argument can actually lead anywhere useful. I think there is agreement on the basic facts, and merely disagreement over characterization; no?
-- David Abrahams BoostPro Computing http://boostpro.com
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk