Subject: Re: [boost] [msm] Review
From: Robert Ramey (ramey_at_[hidden])
Date: 2009-12-07 15:05:30
David Abrahams wrote:
> On Dec 7, 2009, at 11:21 AM, David Bergman wrote:
>> I enjoy being critical of things I like, which is why I always
>> criticize my wife.
> That'll get you far; take it from me.
> For what it's worth, I think that, to the extent that having a
> library accepted at Boost is a disincentive to developing better
> libraries in the same domain, we have a problem. I don't mind you
> asking the question "should there be multiple libraries in the same
> domain?" My answer is yes.
To me the question is simple - should MSM be accepted into boost.
The other question - should state chart be deprecated - is really
a different question. Discussion of this question isn't really related
to the review of MSM. That is, the answer to the second really
doesn't impact the first. Confusing these to issues doesn't really
help the review of MSM.
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk