Subject: Re: [boost] GPL and boost
From: Mathias Gaunard (mathias.gaunard_at_[hidden])
Date: 2009-12-31 06:16:58
Stefan Strasser wrote:
> sorry, I was somehow under the impression that berkeley is GPL-dual licensed.
> but it actually is dual-licensed with a license similar to GPL, but less
> restrictive it seems to me.
> here it is:
This is known as the Sleepycat license.
It's actually even stronger copyleft than the GPL, since not only source
for derivative works needs to be provided, but that of any accompanying
software as well.
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk