Re: [boost] [test] va_copy

Subject: Re: [boost] [test] va_copy
From: Steven Watanabe (watanabesj_at_[hidden])
Date: 2010-01-03 20:15:00

AMDG

Gennadiy Rozental wrote:
> Bjørn Roald wrote:
>> On Friday 01 January 2010 10:15:29 pm Steven Watanabe wrote:
>>> AMDG
>>>
>>> Boost.Test is still failing on some compilers that don't support
>>> va_copy.  Is va_copy always a macro?  Would it be possible
>>> to use #ifdef va_copy?
>>
>> If it helps, that is what is done here:
>> http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/stdcxx/branches/4.1.3/src/exception.cpp
>
> I'd rather stay away from ifdef va_copy. Does it required by standard 
> for the va_copy to be a macro? Which compiler are still failing?

 From the regression tests, msvc-10.0 and intel-vc9-win-11.1.
It also fails with como-win with a vc9 back end.

>>  The commit in trunk adding va_copy is also missing the va_end call 
>> and possibly one more call of va_copy to be correct according to the 
>> manpage.
>
> You mean I need va_end after va_copy? Where is another va_copy?

In Christ,
Steven Watanabe