Subject: Re: [boost] [contract] Contract Programming Library
From: Lorenzo Caminiti (lorcaminiti_at_[hidden])
Date: 2010-01-05 21:38:40
> be considerable in this case, but are you open to discussion about
> possible different approaches? I have a few (completely undeveloped
> and perhaps implausible) ideas.
Jason: Yes, I am interested in alternative approaches (I've studied
more or less all the ones I could find on the Internet). Please write
me an email with your ideas and I'll consider them against the
Contract Programming requirements.
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk