Boost logo

Boost :

Subject: Re: [boost] [log] Release Candidate 4 released
From: Andrey Semashev (andrey.semashev_at_[hidden])
Date: 2010-01-08 17:44:05

On 01/08/2010 08:05 PM, Christian Holmquist wrote:

> One thing that I miss from the documentation are performance numbers and
> guides, I think this is a sensitive issue that should be given its own
> section. By reading the code samples I get some performance concerns only
> because the code looks 'potentially expensive' (named_scopes, for instance),
> having the documentation telling me I should not worry together with some
> tests I could compile and run would elimante such concerns, and spare users
> like myself some time in doing their own (possibly faulty) performance
> analysis.
> Besides this, the documentation I find the documentation good and easy to
> follow.

Yes, I intend to add this section to the docs later. There has been some
performance testing with comparison to log4cxx. You may find interesting
the discussion in this forum thread:

> Edit:
> I just found the performance folder in libs/test/, maybe it'll tell me
> something.

This is a half-baked test that I used to measure performance of
different sink frontends.

Boost list run by bdawes at, gregod at, cpdaniel at, john at