Re: [boost] [function] improvements/proposals

Subject: Re: [boost] [function] improvements/proposals
From: Mathias Gaunard (mathias.gaunard_at_[hidden])
Date: 2010-01-18 07:36:54

Domagoj Saric wrote:
> A while back, in various threads more or less related to the topic, I posted
> various ideas and/or code contributions to the effect of improving
> boost::function in terms of efficiency (concentrated on invocation speed,
> assignement performance/overhead and reducing template and RTTI bloat) and
> configurability, however there was no "official response" as to whether it was
> any good, or whether any of it would be accepted or what's wrong with it if
> not.

You should contact the maintainer of the library, Douglas Gregor, which 
I assume is the one taking those decisions.