Boost logo

Boost :

Subject: Re: [boost] [Boost.utility]
From: Andrew Chinkoff (achinkoff_at_[hidden])
Date: 2010-01-26 06:28:31

Thank you.

I found these suggestions. As often happens, write again - it is easier than
learning the old suggestions. I glanced at the debate
[]. And I decided to
use self singleton implementation because of:
1) it has already written and usual for me (despite the fact that it is
rigid and does not have any policies);
2) at the moment I do not have sufficient time for feedback and
understanding the []
debate (but this is certainly an interesting practice).

So, I am to reject my ambitious boost::Singleton request. It remains for my
personal use only.

P.S.: could anybody tell your experience of Loki::Singleton?

View this message in context:
Sent from the Boost - Dev mailing list archive at

Boost list run by bdawes at, gregod at, cpdaniel at, john at