Re: [boost] Thread-safe singleton pattern

Subject: Re: [boost] Thread-safe singleton pattern
From: Mateusz Loskot (mateusz_at_[hidden])
Date: 2010-01-26 07:26:24

Alex Miller wrote:
> Your implementation seems to be a fairly standard implementation of double
> checked locking, and thus is likely vulnerable to the issues outlined in C++
> and the Perils of Double-Checked
> Locking<http://www.aristeia.com/Papers/DDJ_Jul_Aug_2004_revised.pdf>

Making Singleton is a kind of Sisyphus labour.
I'm wondering if Monostate would be a better candidate for such project.

Best regards,
-- 
Mateusz Loskot, http://mateusz.loskot.net