Re: [boost] [transaction] New Boost.Transaction library under discussion

Subject: Re: [boost] [transaction] New Boost.Transaction library under discussion
From: Vicente Botet Escriba (vicente.botet_at_[hidden])
Date: 2010-01-29 11:13:41

strasser wrote:
> 
> Zitat von "Stewart, Robert" <Robert.Stewart_at_[hidden]>:
> 
>> but "transact" is shorter and seems appropriate.
> 
> I also think Boost.Transact/namespace transact is the most appropriate.
> anyone object?
> 
> (since I had to look it up myself, for the non-native speakers among  
> us: it's not an abbreviation, but the corresponding verb of  
> "transaction")
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Unsubscribe & other changes:
> http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost
> 
> 

OK with Boost.Transact

Vicente

-- 
View this message in context: http://old.nabble.com/-transaction--New-Boost.Transaction-library-under-discussion-tp27210255p27374223.html
Sent from the Boost - Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com.