Subject: Re: [boost] codepad code longevity ?
From: Dean Michael Berris (mikhailberis_at_[hidden])
Date: 2010-01-29 20:59:39
On Sat, Jan 30, 2010 at 9:50 AM, OvermindDL1 <overminddl1_at_[hidden]> wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 29, 2010 at 6:35 PM, Joel de Guzman
> <joel_at_[hidden]> wrote:
>>> Of course, but what if you wanted to post something like a 200+ line
>>> sample without breaking indentation and without syntax highlighting?
>>> Then email breaks down.
>> A 200+ line is not the norm. In such a case, I don't like seeing
>> it in codepad anyway. I'd prefer real cpp/hpp files as attachments
>> or better yet, SVN.
> Especially in my case since I have MSVC+VA so when I open a cpp/hpp
> file everything is color coded properly, so if I see anything,
> *anything* at all in plain black unformatted text, then I know
> instantly something is wrong and where it is.
Good for you that you have MSVC+VA. :)
Anyway, I'm convinced email attachments would be good if the archives
kept the attachments too for future reference. :D
-- Dean Michael Berris cplusplus-soup.com | twitter.com/deanberris linkedin.com/in/mikhailberis | facebook.com/dean.berris | deanberris.com
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk