Subject: Re: [boost] [logo] Boost logo variants for use in unofficial or unreleased boost documentation - was C++ Networking Library Release 0.5
From: Bjørn Roald (bjorn_at_[hidden])
Date: 2010-02-01 00:49:35
On Sunday 31 January 2010 11:20:29 pm Patrick Horgan wrote:
> I've put some new/improved/resized icons up to reflect the discussion.
These are all good as far as layout. I think the two-liners work fairy well.
I dislike the "under construction" variant. If we keep it it should be
changed to "under construction for" two-liner, but I think "preliminary
proposal for" cover tat use case better.
my vote is:
preliminary proposal for
With the option of cutting the first and adding a requirement to add proposal
state information in a mandatory text legend at start of documentation.
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk