Subject: Re: [boost] [transaction] New Boost.Transaction library under discussion
From: Bob Walters (bob.s.walters_at_[hidden])
Date: 2010-02-01 21:32:45
On Fri, Jan 29, 2010 at 2:11 AM, vicente.botet <vicente.botet_at_[hidden]> wrote:
> I'd also prefer a short name, but we need one that is enough significant to be adopted by the Boost community. Quite often transaction is abreviatted as "tx", what about "txl"?
I've seen 'txn' used as an abbreviation for transaction, and
boost::txn might be a viable namespace.
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk