Subject: Re: [boost] [logo] Boost logo variants for use in unofficial or unreleased boost documentation - was C++ Networking Library Release 0.5
From: Thomas Klimpel (Thomas.Klimpel_at_[hidden])
Date: 2010-02-02 11:29:48
Patrick Horgan wrote:
> So, that would leave the USING/POWERED BY pair, the PROPOSED FOR, and
> the regular boost icon which already exists and isn't part of this
> discussion. That's my 7 3/4 cents.
(As a consequence, in my case the logo in the quickbook generated doc would then link to the "powered by boost" logo. I guess that is essentially also what you were arguing for, i.e. that not yet proposed or rejected libraries should use one of the USING/POWERED BY pair.)
> Same comments on PROPOSED FOR as UNDER CONSTRUCTION FOR--wouldn't a
> crane or bulldozer look cool for the graphic?
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk