Re: [boost] [logo] Boost logo variants for use in unofficial or unreleased boost documentation - was C++ Networking Library Release 0.5

Subject: Re: [boost] [logo] Boost logo variants for use in unofficial or unreleased boost documentation - was C++ Networking Library Release 0.5
From: Paul A. Bristow (pbristow_at_[hidden])
Date: 2010-02-02 13:22:58

> -----Original Message-----
> From: boost-bounces_at_[hidden] [mailto:boost-bounces_at_[hidden]] On
Behalf Of
> Thomas Klimpel
> Sent: Tuesday, February 02, 2010 6:12 PM
> To: boost_at_[hidden]
> Subject: Re: [boost] [logo] Boost logo variants for use in unofficial or
unreleased boost
> documentation - was C++ Networking Library Release 0.5
> 
> Paul A. Bristow wrote:
> > Thomas Klimpel wrote:
> > > Patrick Horgan wrote:
> > > > So, that would leave the USING/POWERED BY pair, the PROPOSED FOR, and
> > > > the regular boost icon which already exists and isn't part of this
> > > > discussion.  That's my 7 3/4 cents.
> > >
> > > +1
> > > [...]
> >
> > I'm confused - I understood that the idea of the "Powered by Boost"  was for
> > third party software to announce that they were (proudly we hope) *using*
Boost
> > software in their software.
> >
> > So if you are developing something that you hope will become part of Boost,
you
> > *don't* use this - you need a "Developing for" or "Proposed for " logo - I
think
> > the latter should only be used if in the review queue.
> 
> Then we need a "Developing For" or equivalent logo in addition, because
"Proposed for"
> seems to be reserved for the review queue.

Agreed.

> I would be also OK with this. I just tried to
> come closer to a final agreement. (So I was agreeing with Patrick, and
explicitly spelled
> out what it means in my specific case.)

I'm OK with this.

Paul

---
Paul A. Bristow
Prizet Farmhouse
Kendal, UK   LA8 8AB
[phone], mobile [phone]
pbristow_at_[hidden]