Subject: Re: [boost] [logo] Boost logo variants for use in unofficial or unreleased boost documentation - was C++ Networking Library Release 0.5
From: Paul A. Bristow (pbristow_at_[hidden])
Date: 2010-02-02 13:22:58
> -----Original Message-----
> From: boost-bounces_at_[hidden] [mailto:boost-bounces_at_[hidden]] On
> Thomas Klimpel
> Sent: Tuesday, February 02, 2010 6:12 PM
> To: boost_at_[hidden]
> Subject: Re: [boost] [logo] Boost logo variants for use in unofficial or
> documentation - was C++ Networking Library Release 0.5
> Paul A. Bristow wrote:
> > Thomas Klimpel wrote:
> > > Patrick Horgan wrote:
> > > > So, that would leave the USING/POWERED BY pair, the PROPOSED FOR, and
> > > > the regular boost icon which already exists and isn't part of this
> > > > discussion. That's my 7 3/4 cents.
> > >
> > > +1
> > > [...]
> > I'm confused - I understood that the idea of the "Powered by Boost" was for
> > third party software to announce that they were (proudly we hope) *using*
> > software in their software.
> > So if you are developing something that you hope will become part of Boost,
> > *don't* use this - you need a "Developing for" or "Proposed for " logo - I
> > the latter should only be used if in the review queue.
> Then we need a "Developing For" or equivalent logo in addition, because
> seems to be reserved for the review queue.
> I would be also OK with this. I just tried to
> come closer to a final agreement. (So I was agreeing with Patrick, and
> out what it means in my specific case.)
I'm OK with this.
--- Paul A. Bristow Prizet Farmhouse Kendal, UK LA8 8AB +44 1539 561830, mobile +44 7714330204 pbristow_at_[hidden]
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk