Subject: Re: [boost] [logo] Boost logo variants for use in unofficial or unreleased boost documentation
From: Patrick Horgan (phorgan1_at_[hidden])
Date: 2010-02-04 19:33:11
Stewart, Robert wrote:
> Here's another idea: "for use with." That would apply to all libraries that claim some affinity to Boost, whether because they employ techniques that permit use of various Boost types, concepts, etc., because they provide pieces that can be plugged into Boost libraries, or because they are being developed with the intent to submit for review.
I removed a bunch of the icons and added "for use with" so that you can
see it. I was torn between red or blue on the "for use with"
I think of "FOR USE WITH" as the catchall--it could mean anything almost.
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk