Subject: Re: [boost] [logo] Boost logo variants for use in unofficial or unreleased boost documentation
From: Paul A. Bristow (pbristow_at_[hidden])
Date: 2010-02-05 07:46:19
> -----Original Message-----
> From: boost-bounces_at_[hidden] [mailto:boost-bounces_at_[hidden]] On
> Patrick Horgan
> Sent: Friday, February 05, 2010 12:33 AM
> To: boost_at_[hidden]
> Subject: Re: [boost] [logo] Boost logo variants for use in unofficial or
> I removed a bunch of the icons and added "for use with" so that you can see
I don't like it much.
I doesn't make clear if the library is intended for submission to Boost (or is
just using Boost libraries or in Boost style).
I like red for making clear that it's "Not an accepted Boost library".
What happened to "Developing for" in red icon?
This is what I believe we need for the original posters question.
It's in danger of turning into a bike shed issue ;-(
--- Paul A. Bristow Prizet Farmhouse Kendal, UK LA8 8AB +44 1539 561830, mobile +44 7714330204 pbristow_at_[hidden]
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk