Subject: Re: [boost] [logo] Boost logo variants for use in unofficial or unreleased boost documentation
From: Patrick Horgan (phorgan1_at_[hidden])
Date: 2010-02-09 04:28:33
Bjørn Roald wrote:
> On Sunday 07 February 2010 06:02:48 pm Paul A. Bristow wrote:
>> OK to start a new thread?
> We need to smoke out if there are any real strong objections. As far as
> process, there may be a need to for a formal review, mini review, or vote
> count of some sort. This is somewhat unclear as this is not really a library
> proposal. Logos are however no small issue. However, I think simple yes/no
> vote counts has been used in the past. You should ask how to proceed at this
> point, and if anybody can arrange what is required for formally approving the
> logos. The best would be is that review manager / vote counter are not
> directly associated with the proposal.
> A new thread is a good idea at this point. The discussion has settled on two
> logo use cases and the two logos presented in the proposal are as good as any
> other proposed.
Again I ask, what happened to "PROPOSED FOR"? Shouldn't it be three?
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk