Re: [boost] Proposal for new variants of the Boost logo.

Subject: Re: [boost] Proposal for new variants of the Boost logo.
From: Andrey Semashev (andrey.semashev_at_[hidden])
Date: 2010-02-09 15:13:45

On 02/09/2010 04:47 PM, Stewart, Robert wrote:
>
> Please suggest an alternative.  We tried numerous *short* phrases and
> settled on "for use with" as being the most broadly applicable to
> non-accepted libraries.  If you have a better idea that fits well in
> the logo space available, please share it.  We've found that two
> lines of text can fit nicely in the space we've used, but the two
> lines must be aesthetically balanced.

I must say I'm not quite happy with the "for use with" variant, too. It 
just doesn't quite fit for a library being proposed for inclusion into 
Boost (at any stage of proposal). I may have missed it, but why e.g. 
"designed for" was not accepted?