Subject: Re: [boost] Proposal for new variants of the Boost logo.
From: Andrey Semashev (andrey.semashev_at_[hidden])
Date: 2010-02-09 15:13:45
On 02/09/2010 04:47 PM, Stewart, Robert wrote:
> Please suggest an alternative. We tried numerous *short* phrases and
> settled on "for use with" as being the most broadly applicable to
> non-accepted libraries. If you have a better idea that fits well in
> the logo space available, please share it. We've found that two
> lines of text can fit nicely in the space we've used, but the two
> lines must be aesthetically balanced.
I must say I'm not quite happy with the "for use with" variant, too. It
just doesn't quite fit for a library being proposed for inclusion into
Boost (at any stage of proposal). I may have missed it, but why e.g.
"designed for" was not accepted?
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk