|
Boost : |
Subject: Re: [boost] Proposal for new variants of the Boost logo.
From: Stewart, Robert (Robert.Stewart_at_[hidden])
Date: 2010-02-09 15:45:37
Andrey Semashev wrote:
> On 02/09/2010 04:47 PM, Stewart, Robert wrote:
> >
> > Please suggest an alternative. We tried numerous *short*
> > phrases and
> > settled on "for use with" as being the most broadly applicable to
> > non-accepted libraries. If you have a better idea that fits well in
> > the logo space available, please share it. We've found that two
> > lines of text can fit nicely in the space we've used, but the two
> > lines must be aesthetically balanced.
>
> I must say I'm not quite happy with the "for use with"
> variant, too. It
> just doesn't quite fit for a library being proposed for
> inclusion into
> Boost (at any stage of proposal). I may have missed it, but why e.g.
> "designed for" was not accepted?
We discussed that. It can mean, "designed at the behest of," just as easily as it can mean, "designed for possible inclusion in."
One of my concerns is that any logo put in a library's documentation should be acceptable even if the library is never submitted or is rejected and then developed outside of Boost. I don't think we should rely on the author of a rejected library taking positive action to "correct" the logo in that case. "For use with" is sufficiently innocuous as to not overstate the relationship in that case, or so we thought.
Given that concern, please suggest a better alternative if you can think of one.
_____
Rob Stewart robert.stewart_at_[hidden]
Software Engineer, Core Software using std::disclaimer;
Susquehanna International Group, LLP http://www.sig.com
IMPORTANT: The information contained in this email and/or its attachments is confidential. If you are not the intended recipient, please notify the sender immediately by reply and immediately delete this message and all its attachments. Any review, use, reproduction, disclosure or dissemination of this message or any attachment by an unintended recipient is strictly prohibited. Neither this message nor any attachment is intended as or should be construed as an offer, solicitation or recommendation to buy or sell any security or other financial instrument. Neither the sender, his or her employer nor any of their respective affiliates makes any warranties as to the completeness or accuracy of any of the information contained herein or that this message or any of its attachments is free of viruses.
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk