Subject: Re: [boost] Formal review request: static size matrix/vector linear algebra library (Boost) LA
From: Emil Dotchevski (emildotchevski_at_[hidden])
Date: 2010-02-16 12:41:08
On Tue, Feb 16, 2010 at 6:10 AM, Giovanni Piero Deretta
> [sorry for dropping in the conversation, but I love these games of
> On Thu, Feb 11, 2010 at 5:12 PM, Emil Dotchevski
> <emildotchevski_at_[hidden]> wrote:
>> On Wed, Feb 10, 2010 at 11:20 PM, Joel Falcou <joel.falcou_at_[hidden]> wrote:
>>> Emil Dotchevski wrote:
>>>> By overloading generically, I mean the way other operators are
>>>> overloaded in (Boost) LA: they're namespace-scope functions that
>>>> kick-in for any conforming user-defined vector or matrix type.
>>> Oh yeah OK i see it now.
>>> What about:
>>> at(v, (_2,_1,-_3)) = xxx ; ?
>> Perhaps at<2,1,-3>(v) = xxx
> That would lose the convenience of ADL
Not a problem, since the convenience of ADL is lost already. :)
The operator overloads require the user to use "using" anyway; like
those overloads, at<> would use SFINAE so it won't clash with anything
the user may have defined. I'm pretty sure I've never used "use" so
many times in a single sentence :)
Reverge Studios, Inc.
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk