Subject: Re: [boost] define for 32/64 bitness?
From: Mathias Gaunard (mathias.gaunard_at_[hidden])
Date: 2010-02-17 07:18:07
Oliver Kowalke wrote:
> Seams no tow work for me because I've to provide an aligned stack - the address of the memory must be a multiple of eight (or sixteen on 64-bit systems).
So you want to know the alignment of the stack.
That's a whole other thing altogether, platform-dependent and not
necessarily directly correlated to 32/64 bitness (if that even means
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk