Boost logo

Boost :

Subject: Re: [boost] is review system in place is extremely slow?
From: Phil Endecott (spam_from_boost_dev_at_[hidden])
Date: 2010-02-24 08:37:58

Vladimir Prus wrote:
> vicente.botet wrote:
>> I'm the review manager of Boost.Task but the library is not ready for review, because now
>> Boost.Task depends on Boost.Move, Boost.Fiber and Boost.Atomic (which is not yet on the review
>> queue). Maybe the review withards could add this on the schedule page.
> It's perfectly OK to move those 3 libraries to the 'detail' namespace of Boost.Task and
> have review as it is, as opposed to waiting. What do you think?

Please no. We already have too many things that could be independent
top-level libraries that are hidden as details of other libraries.
Let's not make that worse.


Boost list run by bdawes at, gregod at, cpdaniel at, john at