Subject: Re: [boost] is review system in place is extremely slow?
From: Phil Endecott (spam_from_boost_dev_at_[hidden])
Date: 2010-02-24 08:37:58
Vladimir Prus wrote:
> vicente.botet wrote:
>> I'm the review manager of Boost.Task but the library is not ready for review, because now
>> Boost.Task depends on Boost.Move, Boost.Fiber and Boost.Atomic (which is not yet on the review
>> queue). Maybe the review withards could add this on the schedule page.
> It's perfectly OK to move those 3 libraries to the 'detail' namespace of Boost.Task and
> have review as it is, as opposed to waiting. What do you think?
Please no. We already have too many things that could be independent
top-level libraries that are hidden as details of other libraries.
Let's not make that worse.
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk