Subject: Re: [boost] [math] long double autoconfiguration
From: Vladimir Prus (ghost_at_[hidden])
Date: 2010-02-24 14:43:13
John Maddock wrote:
>>> Great, but can you direct this to the existing test at
>>> libs/math/config/has_long_double_support.cpp ?
>> Done -- I did not realize there's existing test.
>>> Does this mean that we have autoconf-like support now?
>> At least we can building target and deciding what to do next depending
>> on result. There's a lot to improve but the basics are there.
> That might well be enough for most things, looks like I'll have to
> investigate some more!
I'll be tweaking it over next weeks; so don't hesitate to ask me if
you want to add something.
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk