Subject: Re: [boost] [math] long double autoconfiguration
From: Mateusz Loskot (mateusz_at_[hidden])
Date: 2010-02-24 15:00:37
Vladimir Prus wrote:
> John Maddock wrote:
>> Does this mean that we have autoconf-like support now?
> At least we can building target and deciding what to do next depending
> on result. There's a lot to improve but the basics are there.
Great idea, kudos!
Could you give an overview on how these options will work?
Are they boolean flags indicating what components to include
-- Mateusz Loskot, http://mateusz.loskot.net Charter Member of OSGeo, http://osgeo.org
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk