Re: [boost] is review system in place is extremely slow? (was Re: [rfc] rcpp)

Subject: Re: [boost] is review system in place is extremely slow? (was Re: [rfc] rcpp)
From: vicente.botet (vicente.botet_at_[hidden])
Date: 2010-02-25 00:45:25

Hi,
----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Jeffrey Bosboom" <jbosboom_at_[hidden]>
To: <boost_at_[hidden]>
Sent: Wednesday, February 24, 2010 5:34 PM
Subject: Re: [boost] is review system in place is extremely slow? (was Re: [rfc] rcpp)

> 
> On 2/24/2010 3:15 AM, Vladimir Prus wrote:
>> It's perfectly OK to move those 3 libraries to the 'detail' namespace of Boost.Task and
>> have review as it is, as opposed to waiting. What do you think?
> 
> IIRC Boost.Thread already uses Boost.Move internally, and adding it as a 
> detail of Boost.Task would duplicate the code.  If changes are ever 
> necessary in Boost.Move, they would have to be applied in both places.

This is wrong. Boost.Thread has its own specific move semantics emulation.

Best,
Vicente