Re: [boost] is review system in place is extremely slow? (was Re: [rfc] rcpp)

Subject: Re: [boost] is review system in place is extremely slow? (was Re: [rfc] rcpp)
From: Jeffrey Bosboom (jbosboom_at_[hidden])
Date: 2010-02-25 00:49:01

On 2/24/2010 9:45 PM, vicente.botet wrote:
> Hi,
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Jeffrey Bosboom"<jbosboom_at_[hidden]>
> To:<boost_at_[hidden]>
> Sent: Wednesday, February 24, 2010 5:34 PM
> Subject: Re: [boost] is review system in place is extremely slow? (was Re: [rfc] rcpp)
>
>
>>
>> On 2/24/2010 3:15 AM, Vladimir Prus wrote:
>>> It's perfectly OK to move those 3 libraries to the 'detail' namespace of Boost.Task and
>>> have review as it is, as opposed to waiting. What do you think?
>>
>> IIRC Boost.Thread already uses Boost.Move internally, and adding it as a
>> detail of Boost.Task would duplicate the code.  If changes are ever
>> necessary in Boost.Move, they would have to be applied in both places.
>
> This is wrong. Boost.Thread has its own specific move semantics emulation.

Hmmm, I was pretty sure this was mentioned on this list.  Was it another 
Boost library that's already using it, or is it not used at all yet?

Sorry for the misinformation,

--Jeffrey Bosboom