Subject: Re: [boost] is review system in place is extremely slow? (was Re: [rfc] rcpp)
From: Jeffrey Bosboom (jbosboom_at_[hidden])
Date: 2010-02-25 00:49:01
On 2/24/2010 9:45 PM, vicente.botet wrote:
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Jeffrey Bosboom"<jbosboom_at_[hidden]>
> Sent: Wednesday, February 24, 2010 5:34 PM
> Subject: Re: [boost] is review system in place is extremely slow? (was Re: [rfc] rcpp)
>> On 2/24/2010 3:15 AM, Vladimir Prus wrote:
>>> It's perfectly OK to move those 3 libraries to the 'detail' namespace of Boost.Task and
>>> have review as it is, as opposed to waiting. What do you think?
>> IIRC Boost.Thread already uses Boost.Move internally, and adding it as a
>> detail of Boost.Task would duplicate the code. If changes are ever
>> necessary in Boost.Move, they would have to be applied in both places.
> This is wrong. Boost.Thread has its own specific move semantics emulation.
Hmmm, I was pretty sure this was mentioned on this list. Was it another
Boost library that's already using it, or is it not used at all yet?
Sorry for the misinformation,
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk