Subject: Re: [boost] is review system in place is extremely slow? (was Re: [rfc] rcpp)
From: Daniel James (daniel_james_at_[hidden])
Date: 2010-02-25 18:04:17
On 25 February 2010 20:16, Andrey Semashev <andrey.semashev_at_[hidden]> wrote:
> I think, this would at least delay the official acceptance of Boost.Atomic,
> as there will be less spur for it to happen.
Since it looks unlikely that Boost.Atomic is going to put be up for
review in the foreseeable future, delaying another library to
encourage it would be counter productive.
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk