Subject: Re: [boost] is review system in place is extremely slow? (was Re: [rfc] rcpp)
From: Helge Bahmann (hcb_at_[hidden])
Date: 2010-02-26 04:05:41
On Thu, 25 Feb 2010, Daniel James wrote:
> On 25 February 2010 20:16, Andrey Semashev <andrey.semashev_at_[hidden]> wrote:
>> I think, this would at least delay the official acceptance of Boost.Atomic,
>> as there will be less spur for it to happen.
> Since it looks unlikely that Boost.Atomic is going to put be up for
> review in the foreseeable future, delaying another library to
> encourage it would be counter productive.
Actually I was going to propose it for fast-path review once I find the
time to restructure unit tests.
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk